Councillors Push Back Against Overreach

In the Auckland Council Policy, Planning and Development Committee meeting on June 9, 2026, a group of councillors successfully resisted calls for more aggressive upzoning under Plan Change 120 (PC120: Housing Intensification and Resilience). The committee decided to consult local boards and iwi on both Scenario A — the bare legal minimum — and Scenario B, a slightly broader option. This outcome emphasises a balanced approach: prioritising liveable suburbs, parks, tree canopy, parking access for small businesses, and community cohesion alongside targeted housing growth.

Standing firm

Leading the efforts for a measured response were councillors who supported limiting changes primarily to essential government requirements, protecting existing neighbourhoods from broader disruption.

Councillor Daniel Newman (Manurewa-Papakura) moved the amendment for Scenario A only. He highlighted the substantial underused capacity already available in the Auckland Unitary Plan and questioned the need for aggressive zoning changes aimed at significantly impacting house prices. Councillor Matt Winiata (Manurewa-Papakura) seconded the amendment, supporting the least disruptive path that respects local infrastructure limits and avoids widespread rezoning. Councillor Maurice Williamson (Howick) noted that the current Unitary Plan already provides meaningful growth opportunities.

The amendment for Scenario A only was defeated 10-12. Although narrowly lost, their input ensured the more cautious Scenario A remains part of the consultation process. This helps prevent a default move toward wider 6-storey zoning along bus corridors or taller buildings near additional stations.

The counter side

Councillors such as Committee Chair Richard Hills, Mayor Wayne Brown, Julie Fairey, and Shane Henderson advanced the resolution for consultation on both scenarios. They supported elements of Scenario B, focusing density near transit, which they described as pragmatic. The main resolution passed via voice vote, with Councillor Christine Fletcher abstaining.

The legal framework

The process operates under the Resource Management Act 1991 (as amended by the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Act 2025). This framework allows councils to adjust PC120 to align with the government's reduced housing capacity target (around 1.4 million homes), while maintaining stronger natural hazard protections. Key upcoming steps include:

• Local boards and iwi authorities providing feedback on both scenarios.
• A July 2026 committee decision on proposed amendments.
• A further public submissions period (existing submissions remain valid; new round expected around August).
• Review by an Independent Hearings Panel.
• Final council decisions anticipated in mid-2027.

Submissions should address statutory requirements under RMA sections 31 and 32, consistency with the National Policy Statement on Urban Development (NPS-UD) Policy 3, and evidence regarding transport modelling, economic impacts, social return on investment, and environmental considerations such as tree canopy.

Actionable next steps

1. Contact your local board to provide input on preferences for Scenario A, supported by data from Unitary Plan uptake reports and infrastructure studies.
2. Prepare submissions that reference technical reports on capacity, delivery challenges, and community effects.
3. Reach out to relevant councillors with examples specific to local wards, such as parking on Dominion Road or field capacity at Keith Hay Park.
4. Utilise platforms like the City Builders Association for coordinated, balanced feedback.

PC120 interactive map viewer