Auckland Deal: The Plan, the Schedules and the Gaps – A Critical Brief
What the signed Auckland Deal and its Schedules commit to, what they only promise to explore, and the funding and accountability gaps.

On 10 April 2026 the Prime Minister and the Mayor signed the Auckland Deal, the first under the City and Regional Deals framework. This brief draws only on the signed Agreement (including Schedule 2) and Schedule 1, and separates firm commitments from those only to be explored.
1. What the Deal is
Parties. The Agreement is between "His Majesty the King, the Sovereign in right of New Zealand (Central Government)" and "Auckland Council".
Vision. The Agreement opens with a "30 year vision": "New Zealand's global city - driving economic growth and higher living standards." The Foreword calls the Deal "a 10-year plan for Auckland's future that contains a series of commitments as set out in this Agreement."
Term. Under clause 4.1 the Deal runs until "the earlier of: (a) the Implementation Plan has been delivered; (b) the date that is 10 years from the date of this Agreement; or (c) such other date as agreed". Clause 4.2 calls it "a long-term commitment over a 10-year period", with Initiatives able to be added or removed in writing, and clause 4.3 requires a review "within 5 years". Read literally, limb (a) ends the Deal once the Implementation Plan is delivered, which sits awkwardly with the 10-year intent.
Legal character. The Deal is an agreement, not legislation, and changes no law. Both parties warrant it creates "binding obligations" (clauses 5.2 and 5.3), but these are mostly about process. Clause 2.4 makes commitments "subject to applicable decision-making processes and approvals including Long Term Plan processes for Auckland Council". Clause 5.4 records that "Central Government has made no warranty or representation that any funding or financial support is or will be available from it to Auckland Council in respect of the Deal." Clause 9.7 says neither party is "a partner" of the other in a legal sense. Many commitments rely on reforms not yet law; Schedule 1 commits the parties to "prepare to implement the new transport reform and resource management system in Auckland in advance of the new legislation being enacted."
Expectations. Clause 1.4 lists each side's expectations. The Crown's include working with the Council so that it "makes significant progress to close its infrastructure deficits without new funding from Central Government" (clause 1.4(d)) and "comprehensive adoption of Central Government's priority reforms" (clause 1.4(e)). The headline economic target appears among the Council's expectations, at clause 1.4(f): to "make significant progress towards the shared vision of increasing average regional GDP growth by 2.9% by 2045, and contributing an additional $21.6 billion to the national economy".
2. The Implementation Plan requirement
Clause 1.6: "The parties will prepare an Implementation Plan within six months of the signing date for approval by the Responsible Ministers and Councillors. Once approved, the Implementation Plan will form part of the Deal." Six months from 10 April 2026 is 10 October 2026.
Clause 1.7 sets its content: "The Implementation Plan will clearly define how the Initiatives will be delivered, when they will be delivered and who will be responsible for their delivery as well as key milestones, metrics and reporting requirements for this Deal." It "may provide for" Project Plans and individual project agreements.
The approvers (clause 3.2) are the Ministers for Infrastructure, Local Government and Auckland, and the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Policy Planning and Development Committee Chair, on the Oversight Board's recommendation (Schedule 2, paragraph 1.2(b)).
Schedule 1 admits the Deal is unfinished: "The Initiatives and related commitments of the Deal are at various stages of design and delivery. The Implementation Plan and Project Plans will be developed as commitments are further scoped."
Public status. We could not find a published Implementation Plan on beehive.govt.nz or aucklandcouncil.govt.nz as of 28 October 2026. The Agreement does not expressly require publication, though clause 2.2(b) commits the parties to "ensure appropriate transparency and public accountability in relation to the Deal" and clause 6.3 notes Deal material may be official information under the OIA and LGOIMA.
Drafting issues. Clause 10.1(h) describes the Plan as "prepared pursuant to clause 6", which is about confidentiality. There are two clauses 2.3, and Schedule 2 has two paragraphs 2.7. Minor, but worth fixing in a process document.
3. Schedule 1: the eight key areas
Clause 1.5 lists eight key areas, which Schedule 1 expands on.
3.1 Partnership for Growth
The firmest commitments are about meetings: "At least three meetings per year between the Prime Minister and the Mayor", regular meetings between the Mayor and senior Ministers "(with each minister determining cadence between monthly to biannually)", and "Regular reporting and monitoring on agreed commitments." The parties will prepare jointly for the new transport and resource management systems, including a "Regional Spatial Plan with regulatory weight" and "A 30-year transport plan", and the Government "will continue to work with Auckland Council on PC120".
3.2 Innovation, technology and science
The joint commitments are to "work together" on recognition, coordination, policy and investment attraction. Initial areas: the City Centre to Newmarket Innovation Corridor, the Te Puna Creative Innovation Precinct (West Auckland) and the Southern Manufacturing, Logistics and Energy Corridor.
The Year 1 joint priorities are:
- "Launch the NZ Institute for Advanced Technology (NZIAT) and pursue co-location with the NZ Defence Tech Accelerator and Research and Education Advanced Network New Zealand (REANNZ)".
- "Consider targeted support to enable University of Auckland's flagship Innovation Centre (including MedTech-iQ)".
- A joint innovation prospectus.
- "Consider how Auckland and Central Government can align and support their respective trade missions" to India, China and Southeast Asia.
- "Support for Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's Drury campus."
- "Preparatory work with NZ Steel and Outset Ventures on the location of a major product accelerator at Glenbrook."
The Council will make "a competitive offer" to host the NZIAT hub. A proposed innovation showcase is "Private sector funded."
3.3 Global trade, tourism and investment
Most items are "work with" commitments: a destination and major events strategy, marketing for direct flights from India and South America, cruise turnaround support and a trading hub strategy. Ministries will "support (but not direct)" efforts towards a non-stop India air service "by 2028".
The one clear cash item here is the Auckland Tennis Centre: "Central Government, Auckland Council and the Auckland Tennis Centre will each contribute $5m to the project." That is $15m in total, $5m of it Crown money.
3.4 Transport as an enabler of growth
The parties will use "the new legislative transport planning and decision-making mechanisms" to set priorities through "the first iteration of a 30-year transport strategy, that contains a 10-year indicative investment programme." The agreed Deal transport priorities are:
- Level crossing removals.
- The Rapid Transit Network, "including as initial priorities progressing the Northwest Busway and Botany-to-Airport."
- Smaller-scale congestion initiatives, including dynamic lanes.
- Freight and trade connections to the Airport and Port.
- NZTA route protection and designation for the Mill Road corridor Stages 2 and 3.
The Crown will reflect these in "GPS 2027 ... unless changed by the jointly agreed 30-year transport plan ... or the NLTF prioritisation process", and "The NZTA Board will be responsible for approving funding from the NLTF." GPS inclusion is not a funding guarantee. The WaitematÄ Harbour Connections project gets only a "work closely" commitment. The Crown will "explore Auckland specific settings" for parking charging, express and dynamic lanes, bus lanes and tolling, and all new roads "will be assessed for tolling". The Council will partner on funding "including rates, IFFA, targeted rates and developer levies."
Unlike innovation, transport has no separate Year 1 priority list in Schedule 1.
3.5 Natural environment and harbour
The parties "will work together to realise the aspirations of Predator Free 2050, Pest-Free Auckland, the Auckland Indigenous Biodiversity Strategy and to restore the biodiversity of the Hauraki Gulf." The Crown "will investigate the resource it can bring". No funding is stated.
3.6 Urban development and growth
The two sides' positions are recorded separately; the Council's says "growth has never paid for growth in the past". The parties will prepare a joint Regional Spatial Plan, and the Crown is replacing development contributions with a Development Levy and amending the IFF Act "to better enable growth to pay for growth".
Four joint greenfield principles apply. Principle 1 is "Growth pays for growth": growth-related infrastructure costs "are met by those who benefit from that development, not by existing communities elsewhere in the region, or by general ratepayers." The others cover market-led efficiency, credible developer delivery and infrastructure capacity. Under clause 2.1(a) the Council "will seek to maximise the funding and financing tools ... to enable, where possible, growth to pay for growth."
The Council will revisit its Future Development Strategy covering 15,000 hectares of Future Urban areas and notes "$13.6 billion of infrastructure" in current greenfield plans, "subject to council's budget and planning processes". The Crown "will continue to explore new Crown funding for councils through Pillar 3 of Going for Housing Growth."
3.7 Priority growth areas
Drury. The parties will work with developers on "an agreed development and investment plan and sequencing for Drury". An oversight group will be set up, and they will "Jointly investigate the use of Infrastructure Funding and Financing". The Council will set up a programme office and plans "an estimated $3.5b programme of local growth infrastructure", again "subject to council's budget and planning processes". Health New Zealand "will commit to pursuing the development of a new hospital in Drury" and will "seek a decision on the build of the hospital in the early 2030s."
Maungawhau-Kingsland-Morningside CRL Growth Corridor (including Eden Park). The Council will progress Plan Change 120 "to enable significant additional density within the walkable catchments" of the three stations. For Eden Park, the Crown "will recognise Eden Park as the National Stadium of NZ"; the Council will establish "a new single stadium operator entity"; and the Council will "consider writing off the $54m loan ($48.75 drawn down) to the Eden Park Trust" subject to conditions. The Crown "will consider Eden Park's request for funding to enable an upgraded stadium and asset renewal."
On cricket: "Auckland Council will commit $5m to the development of Colin Maiden Park" and "Central Government will commit $5m to the development of Colin Maiden Park to enable the interim solution". Both are described as advance payments "in partial satisfaction of Auckland Cricket's rights at Eden Park". An interim arrangement is targeted "from the 2026/27 cricket season".
City Centre. A revised city centre action plan will "seek to leverage the projected pipeline of $6.8 billion in private investment". The Council's own spending is funded by the City Centre Targeted Rate: about "$1billion for growth related infrastructure", "$300m" for the redevelopment programme and roughly "$60 million" for a post-CRL revitalisation plan. Crown items include office-to-residential rules, a city centre primary school feasibility study, Cloud and Queens Wharf ownership, antisocial behaviour enforcement, and "$750k for one year" already contracted for a homelessness programme.
Airport Precinct. The Council, the Crown and Auckland Airport will prepare "a development and investment plan". Initial priorities are access at the Landing Intersection and Southeastern Access (Puhinui Road and the Pukaki Bridge), and "Considering appropriate funding and financing tools".
3.8 Other enablers of growth
- Crown uplift. Clause 2.1(c): if the Council "identifies net new funding for an Initiative above the 2024 - 2034 Long Term Plan and business-as-usual funding ... Central Government will work with Auckland Council to agree a level of financially sustainable co-funding". Schedule 1 adds that this is "on a case-by-case basis" and only where new funding is "significantly above" LTP and BAU levels; no rate or amount is set.
- No new Budget money for three years. Clause 2.1(d): "during the first three years of the Deal ... no additional funding is expected to be made available under Central Government Budgets during that time."
- Time of use charging. Net revenue goes into "a hypothecated fund" for jointly agreed strategic transport projects. The Crown "will support the development" of the policy and legislation.
- Accommodation levy. The Crown "will explore an accommodation levy policy in 2027."
- Surplus land, IFFA and development contributions. These are commitments to "explore", "identify" and "continue to work with".
4. Schedule 2: governance, monitoring and accountability
Oversight Board. Clause 3.4 requires the parties to set up the Auckland Deal Oversight Board "within 30 Business Days" of signing. Schedule 2, paragraph 1.1 lists eight officials, four Crown and four Council. Independent and private sector, iwi/MÄori or community members may be added, but only "if agreed" and as "non-voting" members. The Board's functions (paragraph 1.2) include recommending approval of the Implementation Plan, overseeing progress "against agreed milestones ... and performance measures or metrics", resolving disputes and recommending changes to Initiatives. Paragraph 1.3 requires Council-run advisory leadership boards.
Steering Groups and Working Committees. These are set up "where additional oversight is needed" (clause 3.5). Only one is confirmed: an Urban Development Steering Group (clause 3.6). Steering Groups prepare Project Plans; Working Committees run delivery.
Reporting. Steering Groups report quarterly to the Board (paragraph 1.7). The Board reports six-monthly to the Responsible Ministers and Councillors, by the 10th Business Day after the end of each March and September (paragraph 1.4). Clause 3.3 requires those Ministers and Councillors to meet "at least every six months".
Metrics. Paragraph 2.2 says the parties "will define specific metrics" and "may undertake monitoring and performance evaluation of those metrics from the first anniversary". Paragraph 2.3 says the Board "will consider defining and publishing a dashboard". Possible measures listed at paragraph 2.6 include "GDP, population, spend metrics, tourism numbers, housing consents and/or compliance certificates issued". An independent review "may" be commissioned, and a process evaluation is required in the final 12 months (paragraph 2.8).
The structure is sensible, but reporting goes to Ministers and Councillors, not the public, and metrics are yet to be defined.
5. Assessment
Soft language dominates. Across Schedule 1 the main verbs are "work together", "consider", "explore", "investigate" and "support". Firm, dated, costed commitments are few. The larger numbers ($13.6 billion greenfield, $3.5 billion Drury, about $1 billion City Centre) are Council spending "subject to council's budget and planning processes".
Little hard new money. The clearest new cash items are $5m from the Crown and $5m from the Council for Colin Maiden Park, and $5m each from the Crown, the Council and the Tennis Centre for the Tennis Centre. With clauses 2.1(d), 1.4(d) and 5.4, this means no new Crown money for growth infrastructure in the early years.
The uplift tool puts the risk on the Council. Crown co-funding is offered only where the Council first raises net new money above its LTP and business-as-usual levels, for example through "asset recycling" or targeted rates. In practice, Crown money depends on the Council selling assets or raising new local charges first.
Much depends on the Implementation Plan and private capital. Clause 1.7 leaves delivery dates, responsibilities, milestones and metrics to the Implementation Plan, and we could not find a published version. Several initiatives rely on private money, including the $6.8 billion city centre pipeline and developer-funded greenfield growth.
Aligned with reforms, weak on revenue and devolution. The Deal tracks the Government's resource management, transport and funding reforms closely. Its immediate revenue tools are mostly ones the Council already has, or await legislation or a 2027 decision. It devolves no new powers, and the Crown keeps oversight of local charges "given this may include a right to tax." Clause 2.2(f) speaks of "seeking opportunities to empower Auckland Council", which is not a transfer of powers.
The GDP target has no funded path. The figure is "increasing average regional GDP growth by 2.9% by 2045" with an "additional $21.6 billion", recorded as a Council expectation in clause 1.4(f) and described as a "shared vision". The documents do not explain its basis or how "by 2.9%" should be read, or link it to funded actions or milestones. It is a goal, not a plan.
What the Deal does offer. Regular ministerial access, agreed transport priorities for GPS 2027, joint spatial planning, a hypothecated time of use fund and an Eden Park pathway are real coordination gains, if the Implementation Plan delivers them.
What to watch
- Whether the Implementation Plan has been completed and approved, and whether it is published with dated milestones, named responsibilities and costs.
- Whether Oversight Board reports or a dashboard are published.
- How GPS 2027 treats the Northwest, Botany-to-Airport, Mill Road and CRL level crossing projects.
- The first use of the Crown uplift.
- Time of use charging legislation.
- The 2027 decision on an accommodation levy.
- Progress on Plan Change 120, the Eden Park model and the cricket transition from the 2026/27 season.
- Which metrics are adopted for the GDP target, and whether any are reported from April 2027.
- The five-year review under clause 4.3, and clarification of the clause 4.1 term wording.
Sources
- Auckland Deal Agreement, 10 April 2026 (includes Schedule 2, Governance, monitoring and accountability). Beehive: https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2026-04/City%20and%20Regional%20Deals%20-%20Auckland%20Deal%20Agreement%20.pdf. Copy published by the Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport: https://www.mcert.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Local-government-documents/City-and-regional-deals/Auckland/Auckland-Deal-Agreement-April-2026.pdf
- Schedule 1, Summary of Commitments. Beehive: https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2026-04/Auckland%20Deal%20Schedule%20.pdf. Ministry copy: https://www.mcert.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Local-government-documents/City-and-regional-deals/Auckland/Auckland-Deal-Schedule-April-2026.pdf
Join the discussion
Community members are invited to add perspective, evidence, or a sharp question. Be specific and keep it civil.
No comments yet. Be the first to weigh in.
Written by Mark Pervan, Director, City Builders Association Limited
Mark Pervan is the founder and director of City Builders Association Limited, an Auckland civic think tank funded solely by membership. He has run manufacturing plants, with global sourcing and supply chain management in the same role, and has been project manager on multiple commercial and residential building projects. He was also responsible for product design and development across multiple mediums, and served as sales and marketing manager. He is a company director and business owner, including as a director of Idea Foundry. He served three years as an elected member of the Puketāpapa Local Board (2022–2025) and was a council candidate for the Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa ward of Auckland Council.
Mark on LinkedIn


